Why number portability should be implemented in india

Well friends the debate on implementation of number portability in India is now almost 3 years old. The issue keeps popping up every time TRAI comes out with some statements. Here are the extracts of my arguments in favor of implementing the same. These were presented at a debate at IIM Bangalore. I have covered them in a post earlier , but am repeating them in view of the currency of the issue. I welcome your comments on the same. -

What is number portability (NP)?

Number Portability
 allows subscriber to change their service provider to one having –
 the best service quality
 lower tariff options,
 & better network coverage

while retaining their old telephone number.

Technological reasons for implementing

Arguments against implementation - India not yet ready as Implementation requires large technological changes;

My Argument why it should be implemented
Our Mobile network is state of the art; technically much better than many countries where MNP is already working
 We introduced many services ahead of even developing countries e.g. GPRS
 Fixed line NP may have problems; can be sorted and taken up in next stage
 If it can work in S Korea – 2004; Greece – 2004; Lithuania – 2005; Belgium – 2000; Honk Kong - 1998
 why not in India

Arguments against implementation - India not yet ready as Our tele-density is still much below developed countries; We should concentrate on increasing tele-density; We have enough operators for competition

My Argument why it should be implemented
 Mobile nos. in India are largely in Urban areas. Our urban tele-density is ~40.
 We added almost 18m mobiles in last 3 months. That means urban teledensity has increased over 6 in last three months.
 Requires 12-18 months in implementation after decision. Urban tele-density may cross 50 by then. following table indicate that we will be at par or better than developed countries in terms of tele-density for implementing Number Portability(NP)

 For one service say GSM mobile we have maximum 4 operators per service area

Economic reasons

Arguments against implementation - Implementation require huge initial investments, which will outweigh the benefits. Rather we should Concentrate on improving service quality

My Argument why it should be implemented
 Its exactly the service quality for which we need NP
 Today India has one of the lowest rates for mobile services but quality of service offered is poor
 NP eliminates pseudo and psychological barriers to churning thus providing truly competitive market and service quality improvement
 Some estimate costs as high as 5000 Cr for implementation which are amplified and incorrect estimate even for implementing full fledged NP across services, operators & Locations
 Implement just Mobile NP, then go for fixed line
 Call forwarding technology does not requires much costs
 Even other technologies for mobile number portability we require central database, routing and query arrangements. It will not cost more than 150 cr to implement.
 India has 85m mobile connection now. By 2007 they will be more than 150m. Even if 10% use NP we have 15m users. (Spain 3m used.); International Data Corporation India conducted a survey and found that “30% of mobile subscribers are likely to shift to an operator offering better service, if given the option.” Internationally 10% churning of numbers with NP is common as shown in following figure-

 Charge of Just Rs 200 can cover costs. Internationally average charges are around 12-14$.
 If consumer is ready to pay for better service and availing better tariffs, why it should not be implemented

Operational reasons

Arguments against implementation - Implementation will have problems of distortions by donor networks

My Argument why it should be implemented
 Good planning and proper regulations on following issues can help in smooth operations –
 Go for all India implementation
 Don’t go for call forwarding option
 Locking of handsets to be banned
 Address lock in period problems
 Costs to be collected and born by recipient networks
 Operational problems can always be sorted out in time. After all India is not the first country to implement the NP

The US Supreme Court has directed adoption of number portability and India should also follow. The department of telecommunications (DoT) has set April, 2007 as the deadline for the implementation of mobile phone number portability. The deadline had been recommended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) and submitted to the DoT in March '06
 India is well prepared for introducing number portability
 It should be introduced in phased manner –
 Mobile number portability across the nation amongst all operators
 Then fixed number portability
 Non implementation of NP will negate the concept of “True market” and operators will go on compromising on service quality standards

No comments:

Search your favourite topic

3G (23) 4G (10) africa broadband (2) African Telecom (3) Aircell (4) airtel (20) Android (4) Apple (6) Asia Pacific Telecom market (8) bharti (7) broadband (39) Broadcasting (1) BSNL (10) CDMA (10) china mobile (37) China Telecom Market (13) cross media ownership (1) digital divide (3) DoCoMo (3) DoT (3) DTH (1) EDGE (2) Enterprise Telecom Business (5) ericsson (4) etisalat (1) European Telecom market (9) EVDO (1) FCC (2) fixed line market (1) fixed mobile convergence (2) forecasts for mobile market (5) GTL (1) HSPA (7) Huawei (2) idea (10) India 3G (47) India CDMA (50) India GSM (60) India Mobile (48) infrastructure sharing (6) International Long Distance (3) Internet service providers (3) Intra Circle Roaming (1) Ipad (1) IPTV (5) ITU (1) largetst telecom operator (6) latest telecom news (54) LG (2) LTE (10) M-commerce (4) Managed networks (2) Maxis (3) Middle Eastern telecom market (6) MIMO (1) mobile (21) mobile advertising (2) Mobile banking (5) mobile handsets (14) Motorola (3) MTNL (3) MVNO (2) Next Generation Networks (1) nokia (7) Nokia Siemens (1) number portability (6) OFDMA (1) QUALCOMM (1) Reliance Communications (16) RIM (2) Rural broadband (1) rural mobile infrastructure (9) Russia (1) Samsung (4) satellite communications (1) Smart Pad (1) Smartphone (3) Sony Ericsson (2) South East Asian Market (3) Spectrum (9) Spice (1) strategy for mobile operators (63) Symbian (1) Tablet (3) Tariff (1) Tata Communications (2) Tata Teleservices (5) TD-SCDMA (2) Telcordia (1) Tele-density (4) telecom equipment (22) Telecom growth projections (13) Telecom Market India (57) telecom market share (17) telecom operator strategy (40) telecom policy (32) Telecom regulation (7) telecom sector india (31) TRAI (13) Unique Identification Authority of India (1) US Telecom market (11) USO fund (4) VAS (2) verizon (6) Virgin (1) Vodafone (1) vodafone india (11) VoIP (5) VSNL (2) WAN (1) WCDMA (4) WiBro (1) WiFI (13) WiMAX (20) wireless broadband (43) wireless US (12) WMAN (1) Yota (1) Zain (1) ZTE (2)